Dictators, Democrats, and Iran – Is There a Difference
Dictators, Democrats,
and Iran – Is There a Difference
Perfect is the enemy of good.
I have always favored the 85% solution over the perfect
solution, as perfect is never achieved, but with an 85% solution one can look
to improve it if the situation allows. The fourteen point Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the Trump administration and Iran is just that a
memo. The objectives President Trump laid out has achieved 99% of what he set
out to do – stop Iran from making a nuclear weapon and destroy their ability to
do so.
Yet, even before release of the text the whiners showed up
in droves to condemn it, forgetting that Iran has been decimated, their nuclear
dust buried, and military 85% plus destroyed. That was just the Democrats. Now,
the Republican whiners are coming out of the woodwork to Monday morning
quarterback something they could not even have imagined in their wet dreams.
There are a couple of elements to cover here, the first is the
MOU and it being the initial “guidelines” for a century plus of peace in the
Middle East and Iran. Or, if they Iran does not comply, the end of the Mullahs
and a theocracy of tortured demons. The second is to understand how similar
Iranian dictators are to their democrat allies.
The fourteen point MOU – point by point. One, both
sides declare end of the war. Two, both sides agree to not interfere in the
other country. Three, a big deal, both sides “commit” to “negotiating” and
achieving the “final deal” in a maximum of 60 days! I will come back to that.
Four, the Straights of Hormuz is opened by both sides, and US will move it
forces from the “proximity.” Five, Iran
will allow safe passage through the straights, remove obstacles (aka mines), and
will consult with Oman “in line with…international law and the sovereign rights
of costal states.” A nice way of saying no charge, no fee, no $200 to pass go.
Six, the US will work with partners to “develop” a “mutually
agreed plan,” for reconstruction of Iran…to be “finalized” as part of the
“final deal within 60 days.” “All waivers, permissions, etc. will be granted by
the USA.” A nice way of saying ain’t shit happening unless US oks it! Seven,
The USA “undertakes” (meaning not immediate) to terminate all sanctions…address
these issues in the “negotiations.” Eight, Iran shall not procure or develop
nuclear weapons! A big deal, the goal of this operation. And will “resolve” the
disposition of the nuclear dust pursuant to a “mechanism that is mutually
agreed upon.” The details to be discussed in the “negotiations.” Nine, both
agree to maintain the status quo of its nuclear program. Iran’s nuclear
program, and weapons grade uranium dust are destroyed or buried. Please note –
that is the status quo.
Please note, to this point, there is an awful lot that has to
be negotiated in 60 days or less. So, all the nanny boo boo’s whining about the
MOU either have not read the damn thing or have as usual placed their heads in
their rear orifices to ensure the sound emitted remains full of crap. Ten, the
US “undertakes” upon signing…and “until termination of sanctions” …to issue
waivers, etc. Notice the word “undertakes” is used several times. Undertakes
means to commit to begin; to take on…so the definition leaves a lot of maneuver
room. Eleven, the US “undertakes” to make available for use frozen Iranian
funds upon “implementation” of the MOU. Implementation – means in full. But the
“negotiations” etc., are part of the implementation, so one can argue no full
implementation until those negotiations are over, signed, sealed, and
delivered. That is a big point that the whiners do not seem to realize, and a
lot of these nay sayers are lawyers! Reminder, do not hire them as lawyers, and
consider not reelecting them because they are losers.
Twelve, “an executive” mechanism will be “established” to
monitor compliance. Hmmm, established, but in line with other elements being
“undertaken,” and “final negotiations” not done. Please note. Thirteen, after
signing…and “subject to the beginning of the “implementation” of paragraphs 1,
4, 5, 10, 11…and the continuing “implementation” the US and Iran will “start”
negotiations regarding the “final deal.” So many, many, steps to be taken as
the “final” negotiations…to be done within 60 days “start.” Fourteen, the
feckless UN Security Council will be endorsed by a binding UNSC resolution. The
point here is to get the “world” body to agree on the steps Iran MUST take.
This is stated so that in the event of any breach of the MOU or final agreement,
we just go in and remove the remaining Iranian leader’s … making them the
equivalent of the nuclear dust.
Dictators, Democrats, and Iran – What’s the Difference?
The radical left in Iran, the clerics, used the veil of
religion to overthrow the Shah, and replace a constitutional monarchy with a
dictatorial theocracy. While the Shah was not perfect, his actions saved Iran
from radical left communists, and the expansion of the Soviet Unions grasp in
the Middle East. People forget that throughout Iran’s thousands of years
history, the people have thrown out autocracy a couple of times. The 1958 coup
conducted by the UK and USA to elevate Shah’s position of power and remove the
radical left parliament, was necessary to protect world interests (not just the
USA) from Soviet expansion.
The 1979 revolution brought the typical partners – radical
clerics, radical left students in MEK, and the indoctrinated sheep that fell
for their false narratives together. Does anyone remember Stalin and Hitler
teaming up to invade Poland? Both the 1979 so called “Islamic” revolution and
the Stalin and Ribbentrop (Hitler) pact were deals between two devils to seize
absolute power. And like the Stalin Hitler alliance, once things get going,
only one person can hold that absolute power, so Hitler turned on Stalin and
invaded Russia. And so it was with the clerics, MEK, and sheep in Iran. Once
the Ayatollah gained power, he slaughtered, imprisoned, and tortured the
opposition, created the IRGC to protect him, and created religious bodies to
implement their theocracy and control at the federal and local levels. The
“revolution” ate its young, as all revolutions do.
Like all revolutions from the left they have four consistent
themes. First, they have a charismatic leader; Second, they control the
narrative; Third, they create a crisis (in Iran it was the American hostages),
and Fourth, they use coercion to maintain control.
Which brings me to today’s democrats, who are doing the same
thing here in America. They promote radial left, Marxist, Islamists, like
Mamdani, or Platner, AOC, Bernie, and others. The charisma aspect. They use the
mainstream media to control and spew their false narratives, ensuring the sheep
remain loyal. They control the narrative. They have created a crisis – several
in fact – from the invasion of tens of millions of illegal aliens to the
slaughter of innocents on the streets by the same, and the purposeful
insurrection to stop enforcement of our laws on many fronts. And lastly, they
use coercion, whether its from their radical left domestic terrorist arms like
Antifa or BLM, or from the funding by the likes of Soros or Chinese proxies to create
multiple “instant” riots, anarchy, and terror.
The obvious dichotomy is that the radical left
communists/socialists/fascists (all the same despite different terms) side with
radical Islamists. One side believes government is God, the other side believes
non-believers should be executed for not believing in God. Sorry for pointing
out the obvious for the likes of Mamdani, Hamawy, AOC, Platner, Bernie,
Schumer, Raskin, Warran etc.
So, tell me, what is the difference between Iran, dictators,
and democrats? Not much. So, for those bedwetters who are the nay sayers on the
MOU, understand this is not just a battle between the USA and Iran, it is a
battle – a Cognitive War – between the USA and the opposing side Iran and
democrats. A battle between good and evil! So now one can understand why
democrats are complaining, and some RINOs, because they are on the same side.
The side of evil. That is why Cognitive War is an existential threat to
America, because our leaders remain unaware, unprepared, and unarmed. Thank God
for Donald J. Trump, but he is human and he has only got so much time.
The fight between good and evil is forever! Understand
Cognitive War, or lose your freedom, country, and likely your life!
Edward L. Haugland, © 2026, all rights reserved.
Edward Haugland is the author of “The Cognitive War” and
a leading national expert in this field. He is an award-winning CIA analyst and
retired Defense Department intelligence executive, as well as a U.S. Air Force
veteran, with more than four decades of service in national security across
multiple executive branch departments and agencies.
Comments
Post a Comment