The Crimes & Destruction of our Constitutional, Democracy, and Rights by the 6 January Committee - The Criminal, Complicit, and Compromised?

 

The Crimes & Destruction of our Constitutional, Democracy, and Rights

by the 6 January Committee

The Criminal, Complicit, and Compromised?[1]

The recent hearings of the 6 January Committee and past events related to the Russian Collusion investigation, and (two) impeachments, bring forth several key questions on accountability to our laws. But not for Donald J. Trump, nor for those held in the DC prison for over a year, but for the actions of those on this committee, their henchmen in the DOJ/FBI, the Mueller investigation, and two impeachments. Are their actions criminal, complicit, and do they denote a level of compromise in destroying our republic?

 Let’s look at several, out of many, blatant issues that bring into focus and question the lack of legitimacy of the committee and their whole narrative.

·         The Big Lie – The real ‘Big Lie’ the 6 Jan committee is refusing to look at - is that of Russian Collusion and Hunter’s laptop. So, how is it that those who supported a fraudulent Mueller investigation; participated in (two) impeachment trials[2]; and then voted for impeachment – all based on a series of felonies, lies, disinformation, propaganda, and perjury[3] – are now sitting judgement on others?

·         Guilt by Association: How is it those who stood up a committee, without proper representation for defense, with a blatant bias, who now close using dystopian tactics (i.e., Liz Cheney) by insinuating guilt by association and guilt by exercising their constitutional rights, are not now held accountable for purposeful fraud, sedition, insurrection, and an insurgency?

·         Propaganda Whores: How is it that we are told to believe these charlatans, many of whom have been caught repeatedly lying to the American people throughout the Russian Collusion investigation, the two impeachments, and this committee?

·         Lack of Due Process: How is it that this is other than a Stalinist dystopian show trial – given the committee has allowed no defense, no cross examination throughout this show trial?

·         Tyranny vs Terrorists: Concurrently, how is it that these charlatans are allowed to abuse / ignore the constitutional rights of those imprisoned from 6 January events (now held for over a year) who have had their constitutional rights violated, held in solitary confinement with filthy moldy conditions, and been physically abused while concurrently ensure non-Americans the terrorists of 9-11 and ISIS held in Guantanamo are given full use of our constitutional rights with lawyers, food, and healthy living conditions?

We see a litany of abuse. Guilt by association. Weaponization of national security and justice system, Physical abuse. Subjugation by intimidation. False flag operations. Ignoring domestic terrorism against conservatives. Not imposing the law on trespassers, demonstrators, looters, arsonists, etc. Show trials. Fraudulent warrants, investigations. Gestapo tactics on the unarmed and non-threatening. Abusing constitutional and civil rights.

We must ask Americans to look at Title 18 of the US Code on Crimes and Criminal Procedures for some guidance. This is the law of the land. When we see the actions of many of the committee members, leadership of our DOJ, FBI, CIA, ODNI, DOS, and others during the last six years – and compare the varied firings, trials, and outcomes – we see a great divide and disparity. The collusion unfolding in the ongoing Durham investigation between the criminal and corrupt and the DOJ and FBI is truly surreal and begs the question – who’s guarding our constitutional rights and freedoms? Is the fox watching the hen house? Sure appears that way!

Why is it that all of those in the DOJ, FBI, or other criminals (arsonists, looters, murderers, etc. who destroyed federal buildings, caused over $2 billion in damage), committed fraud, perjury, or other crimes laid out in Title 18 – are given a legal get out of jail free card? And why is it that the 6 Jan committee remains so focused on hiding those truths, but pushing the lies, perjury, and fraud?

There are indeed two Americas – one for those pushing an internal insurgency and insurrection via an ongoing domestic cognitive war to usurp power and impose tyranny, and one for all who oppose such tyranny. It is time to stand up for our Constitutional rights, speak out, demand fair and equitable application of the law before we find, as current practice, our national security apparatus and system of justice turned upside down – the free become the subjugated, the radical dystopian minority becomes all powerful. This November, vote as if your life and freedoms depend on it – as they do!

 

Note: Appendix A contains a small subset of the crimes we’ve all heard, seen, and read about – but which seem lack one successful prosecution? I recommend a fuller review of Title 18. I also welcome any lawyers who still believe and support our Constitution and Laws to actively engage in this arena – to include helping those in DC jails who’ve been denied their basic constitutional rights for over a year.

 

© Edward L. Haugland, All Rights Reserved 2022.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX A: TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – A subset of the code.

§ 2. Principals (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

§ 3. Accessory after the fact Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

§ 4. Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

§ 16. Crime of violence defined The term ‘‘crime of violence’’ means— (a) an offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or (b) any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.

§ 152. Concealment of assets; false oaths and claims; bribery

A person who—

(6) knowingly and fraudulently gives, offers, receives, or attempts to obtain any money or property, remuneration, compensation, reward, advantage, or promise thereof for acting or forbearing to act in any case under title 11... shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

§ 231. Civil disorders (a)(1) Whoever teaches or demonstrates to any other person the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device, or technique capable of causing injury or death to persons, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder…(3) Whoever commits or attempts to commit any act to obstruct, impede, or interfere with any fireman or law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder which in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or…performance of any federally protected function—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

 

§ 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, op[1]press, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same

§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law - Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

 

§ 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

 

§ 372. Conspiracy to impede or injure officer If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to in[1]jure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.

§ 1001. Statements or entries generally (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years


[1] This article is my opinion on the recent hearings of the 6 January Committee- which is inextricably tied to past events of the Russian Collusion investigation and impeachment of President Trump.

[2] Impeachment managers – On the dais of the 6 January Committee we see many of the same House impeachment managers. We must also note that all members of the 6 January committee and impeachment managers voted to impeach – twice. The first set included: Hakeem Jeffries, Sylvia Garcia, Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff (lead), Val Demings, Zoe Lofgren, and Jason Crow. The second set included: Jamie Raskin (lead), Joaquin Castro, David Cicilline, Madeleine Dean, Diana DeGette, Ted Lieu, Joe Neguse, Stacey Plaskett, and Eric Swalwell

[3] By any definition the fraudulent investigation, two impeachments and now the 6 Jan show trial amount to an internal insurgency/insurrection against the will of a majority of the American people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Manchurian President

T he Manchurian President The way to crush the bourgeoisie [ the middle class] is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation [1] - Lenin   My opinion - As a former intelligence analyst and practitioner with over thirty-years of experience in national security across multiple executive departments, intelligence agencies, and defense organizations and services - is that President Biden is not only compromised but exemplifies the ultimate Manchurian President.  I also see him as a traitor to our nation – plain and simple. His actions and deeds, controlled by those we do not yet see, are purposefully destroying our democracy, our legal system, our freedoms, independence, and our republic.  I use Lenin’s quote – as it exemplifies the progressive left’s tactics, using today’s information-age technologies, in concert with our adversaries to destroy our nation, advance their vision of tyranny, ultimately to subjugate the people into pre-defined enclav...
Read more

Hades and Harris – What’s the Difference? Part I of II. America is Dying from Within

Image
  Hades and Harris – What’s the Difference? Part I of II America is Dying from Within What is the difference between the Kamala, who is now the democrat nominee for president, and hades? Well, to be frank, not much. If we consider what a Harris administration would do to America, has she not already much of that with Biden. If she is elected, you’ll see hell on earth – but it will take form in America. We must believe what we see, not what we hear or are led to believe by the deceitful. The best way to do that is to look at the policy impacts of Harris and Biden, and understand they are only a beginning if Harris and Waltz are elected. But before I focus on the actions, intent, and the devastating impacts of the Democrat’s policies on Americans let us look brief look at their nominees. Their policies are represented by the most radical leftist presidential ticket ever. A presidential and vice-presidential nominees anointed without an election, without the public voting, i...
Read more

Who’s Left Holding the Bag – The Progressives Playbook

Image
 Who’s Left Holding the Bag – The Progressives Playbook One has to wonder why Americans haven’t yet figured out the progressive’s playbook when it comes to illegal immigration. It’s like watching the train bearing down the track, the victims (the legal American citizens) are on the track but not tied down. They need only to take a simple act to avoid being run over by the train, like stepping to the side, but for some ungodly reason – they don’t.  The train in this case is illegal immigration, and the act they “could’ve” taken is to vote differently. But they don’t? Not even after all of the progressive candidates telegraphed their intent to open the borders, and worse, give free healthcare, education, and phones to any illegal crossing the border. It doesn’t matter if they’re infected with the China Flu, a felon, a child sex trafficker, a Chinese male of military age, or even an ISIS recruit – the message is come one, come all.  The cognitive dissonance is astounding, as...
Read more