The Crimes & Destruction of our Constitutional, Democracy, and Rights by the 6 January Committee - The Criminal, Complicit, and Compromised?
The
Crimes & Destruction of our Constitutional, Democracy, and Rights
by
the 6 January Committee
The
Criminal, Complicit, and Compromised?[1]
The recent hearings of the 6 January Committee and past events related to the
Russian Collusion investigation, and (two) impeachments, bring forth several
key questions on accountability to our laws. But not for Donald J. Trump, nor
for those held in the DC prison for over a year, but for the actions of those
on this committee, their henchmen in the DOJ/FBI, the Mueller investigation,
and two impeachments. Are their actions criminal, complicit, and do they denote
a level of compromise in destroying our republic?
·
The Big Lie –
The real ‘Big Lie’ the 6 Jan committee is refusing to look at - is that of Russian
Collusion and Hunter’s laptop. So, how is it that those who supported a fraudulent
Mueller investigation; participated in (two) impeachment trials[2]; and then voted for impeachment
– all based on a series of felonies, lies, disinformation, propaganda, and perjury[3] – are now sitting
judgement on others?
·
Guilt by Association:
How is it those who stood up a committee, without proper representation for
defense, with a blatant bias, who now close using dystopian tactics (i.e., Liz
Cheney) by insinuating guilt by association and guilt by exercising their
constitutional rights, are not now held accountable for purposeful fraud, sedition,
insurrection, and an insurgency?
·
Propaganda Whores:
How is it that we are told to believe these charlatans, many of whom have been
caught repeatedly lying to the American people throughout the Russian Collusion
investigation, the two impeachments, and this committee?
·
Lack of Due Process:
How is it that this is other than a Stalinist dystopian show trial – given the committee
has allowed no defense, no cross examination throughout this show trial?
·
Tyranny vs Terrorists:
Concurrently, how is it that these charlatans are allowed to abuse / ignore the
constitutional rights of those imprisoned from 6 January events (now held for over
a year) who have had their constitutional rights violated, held in solitary
confinement with filthy moldy conditions, and been physically abused while
concurrently ensure non-Americans the terrorists of 9-11 and ISIS held in Guantanamo
are given full use of our constitutional rights with lawyers, food, and healthy
living conditions?
We see a litany of abuse. Guilt by association. Weaponization
of national security and justice system, Physical abuse. Subjugation by
intimidation. False flag operations. Ignoring domestic terrorism against conservatives.
Not imposing the law on trespassers, demonstrators, looters, arsonists, etc. Show
trials. Fraudulent warrants, investigations. Gestapo tactics on the unarmed and
non-threatening. Abusing constitutional and civil rights.
We must ask Americans to look at Title 18 of the US Code
on Crimes and Criminal Procedures for some guidance. This is the law of the
land. When we see the actions of many of the committee members, leadership of our
DOJ, FBI, CIA, ODNI, DOS, and others during the last six years – and compare
the varied firings, trials, and outcomes – we see a great divide and disparity.
The collusion unfolding in the ongoing Durham investigation between the criminal
and corrupt and the DOJ and FBI is truly surreal and begs the question – who’s
guarding our constitutional rights and freedoms? Is the fox watching the hen house?
Sure appears that way!
Why is it that all of those in the DOJ, FBI, or other
criminals (arsonists, looters, murderers, etc. who destroyed federal buildings,
caused over $2 billion in damage), committed fraud, perjury, or other crimes
laid out in Title 18 – are given a legal get out of jail free card? And why is
it that the 6 Jan committee remains so focused on hiding those truths, but
pushing the lies, perjury, and fraud?
There are indeed two Americas – one for those pushing
an internal insurgency and insurrection via an ongoing domestic cognitive war
to usurp power and impose tyranny, and one for all who oppose such tyranny. It
is time to stand up for our Constitutional rights, speak out, demand fair and equitable
application of the law before we find, as current practice, our national
security apparatus and system of justice turned upside down – the free become
the subjugated, the radical dystopian minority becomes all powerful. This
November, vote as if your life and freedoms depend on it – as they do!
Note: Appendix A contains
a small subset of the crimes we’ve all heard, seen, and read about – but which seem
lack one successful prosecution? I recommend a fuller review of Title 18. I
also welcome any lawyers who still believe and support our Constitution and Laws
to actively engage in this arena – to include helping those in DC jails who’ve
been denied their basic constitutional rights for over a year.
© Edward L. Haugland, All
Rights Reserved 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPENDIX
A: TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – A subset of the code.
§ 2. Principals
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets,
counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a
principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if
directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United
States, is punishable as a principal.
§ 3. Accessory after the fact Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United
States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender
in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
§ 4. Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a
felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not
as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil
or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than three years, or both.
§ 16. Crime of violence defined The term ‘‘crime of violence’’ means— (a) an
offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of
physical force against the person or property of another, or (b) any other offense that is
a felony and that,
by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the
person or property of another may be used in the course of committing
the offense.
§ 152.
Concealment of assets; false oaths and claims; bribery
A person who—
(6)
knowingly and fraudulently gives, offers, receives, or attempts to obtain any
money or property, remuneration, compensation, reward, advantage, or promise
thereof for acting or forbearing to act in any case under title 11... shall
be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
§ 231. Civil disorders (a)(1) Whoever teaches or
demonstrates to any other person the use, application, or making of any firearm
or explosive or incendiary device, or technique capable of causing injury or
death to persons, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same
will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder…(3)
Whoever commits or attempts to commit any act to obstruct, impede, or interfere
with any fireman or law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful
performance of his official duties incident to and during the commission of a
civil disorder which in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or…performance of
any federally protected function—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than five years, or both.
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, op[1]press,
threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, or because of his having so exercised the same
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law - Whoever, under color of any law,
statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to
the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected
by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or
by reason of his color, or
race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results
from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results
from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to
commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned
for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
§ 371. Conspiracy
to commit offense or to defraud United States If two or more persons
conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States,
or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to
effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
§ 372.
Conspiracy to impede or injure officer If two or more persons in any
State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat,
any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of
confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like
means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as
an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or
property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or
while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to in[1]jure
his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge
of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than six years, or both.
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally (a) Except as
otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive,
legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material
fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document
knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5
years
[1] This article is my
opinion on the recent hearings of the 6 January Committee- which is inextricably
tied to past events of the Russian Collusion investigation and impeachment of
President Trump.
[2] Impeachment
managers – On the dais of the 6 January Committee we see many of the same House
impeachment managers. We must also note that all members of the 6 January
committee and impeachment managers voted to impeach – twice. The first set
included: Hakeem Jeffries, Sylvia Garcia, Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff (lead), Val
Demings, Zoe Lofgren, and Jason Crow. The second set included: Jamie Raskin
(lead), Joaquin Castro, David Cicilline, Madeleine Dean, Diana DeGette, Ted Lieu,
Joe Neguse, Stacey Plaskett, and Eric Swalwell
[3] By any definition
the fraudulent investigation, two impeachments and now the 6 Jan show trial
amount to an internal insurgency/insurrection against the will of a majority of
the American people.
Comments
Post a Comment